The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order by a Judicial Magistrate that discharged accused in a cheque bounce case due to prolonged absence of the petitioner's representative, noting no grounds for intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-cr-wp-405-22.doc
Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND SADANAND SHERLA SHERLA Date: 2022.07.19 16:29:42 +0500
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 405 OF 2022
Godavari Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. … Petitioner V/s. Smt. K.M. Nandini Shenoy and ors. … Respondents
Mr. A. K. Patil for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 19 JULY 2022.
P.C.
. This petition takes an exception to the order dated 4 May 2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Nashik.
“Complainant absent since long. Advocate also absent since long. No steps taken offence punishable U/sec. 420 is compoundable. Hence all accused discharged U/sec. 249 of Cr.P.C. Bail bonds concluded.”
1 / 2
Dinesh Sherla
18-cr-wp-405-22.doc
2 / 2
Dinesh Sherla
Godavari Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd.
Smt. K.M. Nandini Shenoy and ors.
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court