Writ petitioner challenged Family Court interlocutory order denying visitation rights. Bench held no interim order existed; granted liberty for fresh application and dismissed petition given its interlocutory nature.
Liberty to move fresh application for visitation rights before Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-wp-9908-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9908 OF 2019
Santosh Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh (Garud) …Petitioner V/s.
Poonam Santosh Deshmukh (Garud) ...Respondent
Mr.V.S. Tadke i/b Mr. Ameya Vinay Borwankar for the Petitioner. Mr.Nitin Gangal for the Respondent.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 17 June 2022.
P.C. :
1/2
MJ Jadhav
18-wp-9908-19.doc
Family Court. If such application is moved the Family Court shall decide it on it’s own merits.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
2/2
MJ Jadhav
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can intervene against an interlocutory order refusing visitation rights.
Santosh Dnyaneshwar Deshmukh (Garud)
Poonam Santosh Deshmukh (Garud)
N.R. BORKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
