Allowed

Rajesh Industries and Others v. Vyankatesh Pulse Mill, Proprietor Ramnarayan Jagnnath Pallod through Its Gpa L.J. Palod and Others

Bombay HC8 Jul 2022WP/345/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment allows the withdrawal of a criminal writ petition filed for consolidating multiple cheque bounce cases involved in different courts. The court grants liberty to approach the Sessions Judge to consider consolidation under applicable provisions of law.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to move the Sessions Judge for consolidation of criminal cases.

Rajesh Industries and Others Vs Vyankatesh… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

929 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.345 OF 2022

¶3

RAJESH INDUSTRIES AND OTHERS

¶4

VERSUS

¶5

VYANKATESH PULSE MILL AND OTHERS

¶6

Mr. S.S. Bora, Advocate for petitioners

¶7

Mr. V.A. Bagdiya, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3

¶8

CORAM :SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
DATE :08th JULY, 2022

¶9

PER COURT:

¶10

1Learned Advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks

¶11

withdrawal of petition with liberty to move learned Sessions Court, Jalna for

¶12

bringing Summary Criminal Case Nos.999/2020, 1000/2020, 1001/2020 and

¶13

1170/2020 under one roof, as all the matters are before different Judicial
Magistrates at Jalna. He submits that in all the cases the petitioners are the

¶14

accused persons and those cases are under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act. The defence that would be taken by the petitioners in all
the cases would be same and, therefore, it would be appropriate to bring all
those cases in one Court.

¶15

¶16

Cri.WP_345_2022

¶17

2Taking into consideration the prayer for the liberty, definitely, it
appears to be a reasonable prayer, which can be considered by the learned
Sessions Judge. Under such circumstance, the petition is allowed to be
withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Learned Sessions Judge may consider it as
per the provisions of law.

¶18

( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J. )

¶19

agd

Rajesh Industries and Others v. Vyankatesh Pulse Mill, Proprietor Ramnarayan Jagnnath Pallod through Its Gpa L.J. Palod and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Industries and Others v. Vyankatesh Pulse Mill, Proprietor Ramnarayan Jagnnath Pallod through Its Gpa L.J. Palod and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudhir Sukhdeo Bhalerao Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shirode Automobiles Private Limited through the Manager Sayyed Dilawar Fakirbai Vs Valmik Radhagi Kolpe and Anr.

Shirode Automobiles Private Limited through the Manager Sayyed Dilawar Fakirbai Vs Valmik Radhagi Kolpe and Anr.

Gumfabai W/O. Gangadhar Bhalerao Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Jyoti Ganesh Patil and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Anil Karbhari Khatal and Others Vs Alka Anil Khatal and Another