The High Court at Aurangabad granted a conditional stay on a criminal appeal against completion of sentence under Sections 376(3), 377, and 506 IPC. The court condoned a 15-day delay in filing the appeal by the incarcerated applicant, noting that accords
Condonation of 15-day delay in filing appeal allowed; appeal registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cria1914.22
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1914 OF 2022 IN APEALST/5193/2022
SUDHIR SUKHDEO BHALERAO
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr.Virendra Tuwar Advocate h/f. Mr. K.J. Tandale Advocate for Applicant. Mr.R.B. Bagul, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.
CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
DATE : 7th JULY, 2022
ORDER :
filing of the appeal is concerned, whether to condone the delay or not would be within the discretion of this Court and therefore,
cria1914.22
2
it is not necessary to to issue the notice to the informant – respondent No.2.
asb/JULY22
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay caused in filing the appeal by a jail-sentenced accused deserves condonation.
Whether issuance of notice to respondent No.2 (informant) is necessary when Learned APP waives service to respondent No.1.
SUDHIR SUKHDEO BHALERAO
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
