Writ petition wherein counsel for the petitioner satisfied the court that the respondents' stand was unassailable. The petition was dismissed without orders as to costs.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
413-WP-2850-22.doc
Digitally signed by 1 / 1 MEERA MEERA MAHESH MAHESH JADHAV JADHAV Date:2022.09.2013:17:17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2850 OF 2022
Procam Mediatel LLP.
….Petitioner
V/s.
Union of India & Anr…Respondents
----
Mr. Aditya Ajgaonkar a/w Ms Shipraa Tanna i/b Ms Sharon Patole for
Petitioner.
Mr. Jitendra Mishra a/w Mr. Dhananjay B. Deshmukh for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
A.S. DOCTOR, JJ
DATED : 19th SEPTEMBER 2022
P.C. :
1Having considered the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of
respondents, and considering the judgments relied upon in the affidavit in
reply, counsel appearing for petitioner, as an officer of this court and in
fairness states that the stand of respondents cannot be faulted. Counsel
leaves it to the court to pass appropriate orders.
2 Petition dismissed. No order as to costs.(A. S. DOCTOR, J.)(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Meera Jadhav
Procam Mediatel LLP
Union of India
K.R. SHRIRAM
A.S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court