Kamal Jaswantlal Sheth v. Cfm Asset Reconstruction Private Limited and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was filed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act alleging the respondent was economical with the truth by not disclosing all mortgaged properties. The court held that since the petitioner had already filed an application under Section 17 of the Act, the writ petition should not be entertained.
What did the court decide?
No relief; petitioner directed to pursue Section 17 application before DRT.