Petition challenging notices under MRTP Act and a speaking order. Court directed respondent to expedite regularization application and stay coercive steps for three weeks pending decision.
Corporation to decide regularization application expeditiously; no coercive action for three weeks pending decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
3.wp.2425.2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2425 OF 2018
Mohammed Salim Fida Hussain Chohan & Anr. ....Petitioners V/S
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr.
....Respondents
Mr. Uday Warunjikar i/b. Adv. Imtiyaz Patel & Adv. G. B. Naik for the Petitioners.
Ms. Madhuri More for Respondent-BMC
CORAM : A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ
DATED : 16th JUNE 2022
P.C.:
The Petition is filed challenging the notices dated
01.03.2018 and 07.10.2021 issued under the provisions of the MRTP Act and the speaking order dated 16.12.2021.
(i) The Respondent-Corporation shall decide the
1/2
AKN
2/2
3.wp.2425.2018.doc
Regularization Application of the Petitioners expeditiously.
(ii) Until the decision is taken on the Regularization Application and for period of three week from the communication of the decision, no coercive steps shall be taken by the Respondent-Corporation on the basis of the impugned speaking order.
ANANTKRISHNANAIK Digitally signed byANANT KRISHNANAIKDate: 2022.06.1620:58:44 +0530
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
(A. A. SAYED, J.)
2/2
AKN
Mohammed Salim Fida Hussain Chohan & Anr.
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr.
A. A. SAYED
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
