Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition. The High Court granted withdrawal and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw was granted and the Writ Petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
211.22WP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 WRIT PETITION NO.211 OF 2022
M/S. ADITYA CONSTRUCTION
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.S.S.Thombre
AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.R.Kale
Advocate for Respondent nos.2 to 4 : Mr.R.K.Ingole
Advocate for respondent no.6 : Mr.A.M.Gaikwad.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
S.G.DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 17.02.2022
P.C. :
1]Learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ
Petition.
2]Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[S.G.DIGE, J.]
[S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.]
DDC
M/S. ADITYA CONSTRUCTION
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
S.G.DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court