This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
201.22WP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 WRIT PETITION NO.201 OF 2022
M/S.ADITYA CONSTRUCTION
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.S.S.Thombre
AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.R.Kale
Advocate for Respondent nos.2 to 4 : Mr.R.K.Ingole
Advocate for respondent no.8 : Mr.A.M.Gaikwad.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
S.G.DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 17.02.2022
P.C. :
1]Learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ
Petition.
2]Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
[S.G.DIGE, J.]
[S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.]
DDC
M/s. Aditya Construction
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
S.G. Digge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court