Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition to pursue remedy under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs, noting it may not preclude statutory remedies.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SVH 1 14-WP-2083-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2083 OF 2022
Sau. Sonale Dipali Balaji
… Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others … Respondents
Mr. Ajinkya Reddy, Advocate For Petitioner Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP For Respondents – State
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ AND N.B. SURYAWANSHI, J. DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2022
PER COURT :
learned advocate for petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition and to pursue his remedy under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.
withdrawn. No costs.
petitioner to explore his remedy under the provisions of the
SVH 2 14-WP-2083-22.odt
aforesaid Act, in accordance with law.
(N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Sau. Sonale Dipali Balaji
The State Of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
N.B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
