In a writ petition filed for withdrawal, the High Court allowed the petitioner's prayer, disposed of the petition as withdrawn, and vacated any interim order.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition allowed; petition disposed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.12306 OF 2021
Sujeet s/o Satish Deshmukh
… PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
… RESPONDENTS
Mr. Siddheshwar M. Gaikwad Patil, Advocate holding for Mr. Nitin K. Chaudhari, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.R. Yadav, A.G.P. for State
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ AND N.B. SURYAWANSHI, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2022.
P.C. :
Mr. Gaikwad Patil, learned advocate holding for Mr.
Nitin K. Chaudhari, learned advocate for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
(N.B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
fmp/-
Sujeet s/o Satish Deshmukh
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
N.B. Suryavanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
