Petitioner sought writ relief but became ineligible for relief when securing admission to another Sainik School, making the petition infructuous.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47wp 2039.2022.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 2039/2022 Mast. Sai s/o Amol Borhade
Versus
Sainik School Society, Board of Governors and anr.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Court's or Judge's Order
Mr. A.V. Lokhande, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. S. Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General of India for Respondent No. 1
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ. DATED : 02 MAY 2022
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that in view of the subsequent development that the Petitioner has secured admission in the Respondent No. 2 – Sainik School, Chandrapur, the petition has become infructuous.
[ANIL L. PANSARE, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
SMGate
Digitally signed by SANDIP SANDIP MAHADEV MAHADEV GATE GATE Date: 2022.05.04 18:13:37 +0530
Mast. Sai s/o Amol Borhade
Sainik School Society
Board of Governors
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
