On a statement accepted by the court that revisions would be decided within six weeks, the court disposed of the RTI writ petition without intending to bypass pending cases.
Directions to Respondents to give priority to Petitioners without bypassing other pending revisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 5-WP-1724-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1724 OF 2022
Mrs. Chanda w/o Madhukar Tekade & Ors. -- Petitioner/s
Vs.
Principal Secretary, Home (Excise -- Respondent/s Department) & Ors.
Mr. A.M. Ghare, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. K.R. Deshpande, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATE : 2 MAY 2022
P. C. :
Learned Assistant Government Pleader states that the revision application will be decided within a period of six weeks.
SUMIT
2 / 2 5-WP-1724-2022
given to the Petitioners, the Respondents should not give rise to the grievance of others that their pending revisions were unjustifiably by-passed.
Digitally signed bySUMIT CHETAN AGRAWAL Signing Date:05.05.2022 11:00
SUMIT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ petition seeking Right to Information and the privilege due to related pending revisions.
Mrs. Chanda w/o Madhukar Tekade & Ors.
Principal Secretary, Home (Excise Department) & Ors.
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
