The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1 of 2017 for want of prosecution after the record showed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39-WP-1-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1 OF 2017
Harpreet Singh Anand and another
…Petitioners
Versus
Rajiv Raman Gangwani and another…Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP for the State.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATED : 20 JULY 2022
P.C. :-
This Court by an order dated 3 April 2017 issued a notice to the
Respondent No.1. However, the same is returned back with remark that
Respondent No.1 is not residing at the given address. No steps are taken
in the matter since long. It appears that the Petitioners are not
interested in prosecuting the present Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
( N.R. BORKAR, J. )
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2022.07.20 17:32:18 +0530
Kanchan P Dhuri
1 / 1
Harpreet Singh Anand
Rajiv Raman Gangwani
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court