the LA Act of 1894 in the provisions of the State Act (the MRTP Act), none of the Sections of the LA Act of 1894 require application generally or mutatis mutandis. It has further held that on the contrary, there is a specific reference to certain Sections and/or content/language of the Section of the Land Acquisition Act in the provisions of the MRTP Act, and, therefore, the provisions of the LA Act of 1894 introduced in the MRTP Act are limited to the extent of acquisition of land, payment of compensation and recourse to legal remedies provided under the LA Act of 1894 and only these provisions can be read into an acquisition controlled by the provisions of Chapter VII of the MRTP Act but with a specific exception provided in the MRTP Act itself. These observations have been made, see Paragraphs 123 and 191 of Girnar Traders (3) (supra), while considering the provisions of the MRTP Act on the one hand and the provisions of the LA Act of 1894 on the other. These observations still hold good in law as the words, “The Land Acquisition Act, 1894” or its individual Sections, finding their respective places in different provisions of the MRTP Act have now been substituted by the words, “The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013” and relevant Sections of the LA Act of 2013. The new Act, the LA Act of 2013, containing an elaborate procedure for acquisition of land and determination of compensation, etc., and also dealing with the additional rights, we may add, has not
