Disposed

Rajani W/O Ghanshyam Naharkar and Another v. Municipal Council, Narkhed, Nagpur through Chief Officer and Others

Bombay HC29 Nov 2022MCA/570/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed an application seeking review of a writ order. The Court held that since the original order did not restrict the applicants from challenging the appointment of respondent No.2, the review was unnecessary without issuing notice.

What did the court decide?

The Misc. Civil Application was disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents.

Rajani W/O Ghanshyam Naharkar and… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

29-11-2022-mca-570-2022.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

Misc. Civil Application No.570 of 2022

¶5

In

¶6

Writ Petition No.2181 of 2021 (Decided on 24-6-2021)
Rajani Ghansham Naharkar and another

¶7

Versus

¶8

Municipal Council, Narkhed,
through its Chief Officer at Narkhed,
District Yavatmal, and others

¶9

Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders
and Registrar's order

¶10

Shri S.S. Paliwal, Advocate for Applicants.

¶11

CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2022

¶12

1.Heard Shri S.S. Paliwal, learned counsel for the applicants.
His only grievance is that by virtue of the order sought to be reviewed,
there is a possibility of affecting the right of the applicants, who are
the original petitioners, to challenge the appointment of the
respondent No.2.

¶13

2.A careful perusal of the order sought to be reviewed would
show that nowhere in the order, this Court has observed that the
petitioners, who are the applicants here, would not have any right to
question the appointment of the respondent No.2. That means, the
order in question would not come in the way of the
petitioners/applicants in questioning the appointment of the
respondent No.2, if they wish to do so.

¶14

3. Thus, there is no need to issue any notice to the respondents.

¶15

4. The Misc. Civil Application is disposed of in above terms.

¶16

 (ANIL S. KILOR, J.)

¶17

 (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.)

¶18

Digitally Signed By :P D LANJEWAR Signing Date:29.11.2022 17:44 Lanjewar

Rajani W/O Ghanshyam Naharkar and Another v. Municipal Council, Narkhed, Nagpur through Chief Officer and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajani W/O Ghanshyam Naharkar and Another v. Municipal Council, Narkhed, Nagpur through Chief Officer and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Ukanda Avadhut Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Developmnet and Water Resources Dept. Mumbai and Others

Vijay S/O Pesumal Menghani and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Urban Development Dept.

Adv. Ram Khobragade (in Person) Vs Narendra S/O Damodhar Modi and Others

Maha. State Electricity Distr. Co. Ltd. Thr. Superintending Engineer, O and M Circle, Bhandara Vs M/S Uniferro International Ltd. Universal Ferro and Allied Chemicals Ltd. Tumsar