Disposed

Taraj Fastner and Anr. v. the Small Industries Co-Op. Estate Ltd., and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC7 Apr 2022WP/1948/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court recorded statements regarding the hearing before the appropriate authority and directions on implementation of the authority's order. Both the writ petition and the interim application were disposed of in terms of the directions given.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and interim application disposed; order not to be implemented for two weeks from communication if adverse.

Taraj Fastner and Anr. Vs the Small Industries… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

SPB/

1-ia4525-2022.doc

Digitally signed by SHALIKRAM SHALIKRAM PRALHADRAO PRALHADRAO BOREY BOREY Date: 2022.12.02 16:46:01 +0530

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 1948 OF 2022

¶7

Taraj Fastner & Anr. ... Petitioners.

¶8

Versus

¶9

The Small Industries Co-op. Estate Ltd., & Ors. ... Respondents.

¶10

--- WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4525 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1948 OF 2022

¶11

Taraj Fastner & Anr. … Applicants.

¶12

In the matter between :

¶13

Taraj Fastner & Anr. ... Petitioners.

¶14

Versus

¶15

The Small Industries Co-op. Estate Ltd., & Ors. ... Respondents.

¶16

Mr. Atul S. Singh, Advocate for the Applicants/Petitioners.

¶17

Mr. R. A. Shaikh, Advocate and Mr. Hasan Sayed i/by Ms. Savita Malkampate, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.

¶18

Mr. Milind More, Addl. Govt. Pleader for the State – Respondent in Interim Application.

SPB/

1-ia4525-2022.doc

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA & S.G. DIGE, JJ.

¶23

DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2022.

¶24

P.C. :-

¶25

Mr. More, learned Additional Government Pleader tenders a copy of the letter dated 28^th November, 2022, sent by the Desk OfÏcer of the Maharashtra State and states that the Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, Mumbai, would hear the representation in respect of the proceedings arising from the Co-operative Industrial Estate. Statement is accepted. Letter dated 28^th November, 2022 is taken on record.

¶26

The learned counsel for the Petitioners and Respondent No. 1 have jointly agreed that their respective clients would appear before the Authority on 9^th December, 2022 at 11 a.m.

¶27

The learned Addl. Govt. Pleader states that he will inform the authority to hear the parties and shall pass order in accordance with law, within eight weeks from the date of granting personal hearing to both the parties and the order that will be passed by the authorities shall be communicated to both the parties within two weeks from the date of passing

2/3

1-ia4525-2022.doc

SPB/

the order. Statement is accepted.

¶33

If the order is adverse against any of the party, such order shall not be implemented for a period of two weeks from the date of its communication. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any view on the proceedings before the authority. All contentions of both the parties are kept open.

¶34

Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶35

The interim relief granted by this court in the interim application shall continue till the proceedings are disposed of by the authority and the interim relief granted shall be operative for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the order, that would be passed by the authority, to the parties. The interim application is also disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶36

(S. G. DIGE, J.)

¶37

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)

Taraj Fastner and Anr. v. the Small Industries Co-Op. Estate Ltd., and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taraj Fastner and Anr. v. the Small Industries Co-Op. Estate Ltd., and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Vaibhav Wasudev Bhalavi and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Imc Limited and Anr. Vs the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and Anr.

Yashwant Parshuram Shetye Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary (State Excise) and Ors.

Adarsh Precitech and 2 Others Vs the Small Industries Co. Op Estate Ltd. and 2 Others

Denzil Arambhan and 21 Ors. Vs Anil Kumar Manrai and Ors.

Havells India Limited Vs the New India Assurance Company Ltd. and 2 Ors.