The petitioner sought leave to withdraw Writ Petition No. 1913 of 2018. The learned High Court granted the prayer and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15 wp 1913.2018.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1913 OF 2018
Santosh Sopanrav Yadav ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and anr. ….Respondents
Ms. Heena Suvarnakar i/b. Mr. Prashant Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the State.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & SURENDRA P. TAVADE, JJ.
DATE : 18th FEBRUARY, 2022.
P.C. :
of her client, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave as prayed for, is
granted. The writ petition is disposed of, as withdrawn.
( SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
Digitally signed 1/1 by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2022.02.24 10:45:22 +0530
Santosh Sopanrav Yadav
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
Surendra P. Tavade
Prasanna B. Varale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
