Sayyed Sabir Usman v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim application filed by the intervenor to withdraw the application was allowed and disposed of by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.IA.3159.2021..doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3159 OF 2021
UMESH SHRINIWAS MALANI
Digitally signed by UMESH SHRINIWAS MALANI Date: 2022.02.21 09:52:11 +0530
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1875 OF 2019
Sayyed Sabir Usman...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
***
Ms. Rachana A. Karad i/by the Juris Partners for Applicant.
Mr. Amit Patil i/by Parinam Law asso for Petitioner. ***
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
S.P. TAVADE, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 17, 2022.
PER COURT :
1.The Counsel for Intervenor prayed for
withdrawal of the application.
2.Our attention was invited to the order of this
Court dated 20th December, 2021. The Counsel for
Applicant submitted that in compliance of paragraph 2
of the order of this Court dated 20th December, 2021 the
affidavit is ready and she be permitted to tender it
across the bar. The affidavit is taken on record and
marked ‘x’ for identification.
Page 1 of 2
Umesh Malani
4.IA.3159.2021..doc
3.In view of the above referred facts, the
interim application is allowed to be withdrawn and
disposed of accordingly.
(S.P. TAVADE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Umesh Malani
Umesh Shrinivas Malani
Prasanna B. Varale
S.P. Tavade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court