Writ petition challenging Talathi's alleged illegal possession of a vehicle. Court dismissed petition as having alternate remedy of Appeal, allowing the petitioner to avail it.
Petitioner granted liberty to avail alternate remedy of appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 1790.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
964 WRIT PETITION NO.1790 OF 2022
GAJANAN SAMPATRAO UGALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner:
Mr. Tapse Patil Pradeep V.
AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. B. Yawalkar
...
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. G. DIGE,JJ.
DATE:08th FEBRUARY, 2022
PER COURT:
1.We have heard the learned Counsel for the
Petitioner. The learned Counsel submits that the
Talathi has taken over the possession of the
vehicle illegally.
2.The learned A.G.P. raises a preliminary
objection that the Petitioner has an alternate
remedy of Appeal.
3.In view of that, the Writ Petition is
disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to
avail the alternate remedy. All contentions are
kept open. No costs.
2 wp 1790.2022
4.In case, the Petitioner files an Appeal then,
the Authority shall consider it expeditiously and
preferably within one (01) month from the date of
filing.
[S. G. DIGE, J.][S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
Gajanan Sampatrao Ugale
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
S. G. Dive
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court