Dismissed

Ramhari Antaram Gandhale v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Bombay HC2 Feb 2022WP/1512/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad disposed of three writ petitions seeking regularization of services as Kendra Pramukh based on a government resolution. The court directed the competent authority to decide pending applications within six months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent number 4 to decide pending regularization applications on merits within six months.

Ramhari Antaram Gandhale Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

1512.22WP

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

915 WRIT PETITION NO.1512 OF 2022

¶5

RAMHARI ANTARAM GANDHALE
VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.S.S.Thombre
h/f.Mr.M.S.Karad

¶8

AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde
Advocate for respondent no.4 : Mr.P.D.Suryawanshi

¶9

AND

¶10

916 WRIT PETITION NO.1513 OF 2022
DATTATRAY BHAIRU KOKANE
VERSUS

¶11

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS

¶12

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.S.S.Thombre
h/f.Mr.M.S.Karad

¶13

AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde
Advocate for respondent no.4 : Mr.P.D.Suryawanshi

¶14

AND

¶15

920 WRIT PETITION NO.1517 OF 2022
GANGADHAR VISHWANATH SHINDE
VERSUS

¶16

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS

¶17

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.S.S.Thombre
h/f.Mr.M.S.Karad

¶18

AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde
Advocate for respondent no.4 : Mr.P.D.Suryawanshi

¶19

…
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
 S.G.DIGE, JJ.

¶20

 DATE : 02.02.2022

1512.22WP

P.C. :

1]Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the petitioners have given applications for regularization of
the services of the petitioners as Kendra Pramukh on the
basis of the Government Resolution dated 16.02.2018. The
same are pending fore more than one year. It is not decided.

¶25

2]Learned AGP accepts notice for respondent
nos.1 to 3. Mr.P.D.Suryawanshi, learned counsel waives
notice for respondent no.4.

¶26

3]In case the applications of the petitioners for
regularization of the services of the petitioners as Kendra
Pramukh on the basis of the Government Resolution dated
16.02.2018 are pending with respondent no.4, then
respondent no.4 shall decide the said applications, on its
own merits, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as
possible and preferably within six [6] months.

¶27

4]Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶28

[S.G.DIGE, J.]

¶29

[S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶30

DDC

Ramhari Antaram Gandhale v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramhari Antaram Gandhale v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivaji Subhashrao Khanderay Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vidya Khandu Thakur Alias Vidya Vasant Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M/S Zambad Infrastructure Ltd. a Company Registered as Per the Campanies Act 1956 Thr Its Director Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gangadhar Vishwanath Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Dattatray Bhairu Kokane Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Ravindra Sandu Suvarnakar (Nikam ) Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others