point of partition of the property is not new in this world, however, whether that dispute can be said to be an instigation or abetment to the brother to commit suicide, is a question. When a brother asks for his share in the property to be separated, sometimes voice may raise and even from the contents of the First Information Report it can be seen that as the petitioner No.1 was claiming partition in a particular property, partition in another property was also claimed by deceased to petitioner No.1. Both have raised question in respect of opposite sides action regarding dealing with two different properties. Therefore, such act of demanding partition, by any stretch of imagination, will not amount to abetment. The fact that there was dispute can be expected, however, not lodging of immediate First Information Report might have raised to concoction of the story to the extent that the petitioner No.1 had given threat to kill by saying that he should not reside in the house. Rather it gives an impression that both the brothers were residing separately since prior to that date i.e. 18.11.2020. Further, as aforesaid, the A.D. came to be lodged on the same day but it took about one and half month to lodge the First Information Report. Further, the First Information Report is silent about any earlier incident and statement to that effect which was alleged to have been made by the deceased alleged to be too vague. It cannot be stated that there was mental or physical harassment of Dattatraya about one year prior to 18.11.2020. Statement of Somnath Tulshiram
