that the appellant has given threat that "fetch Rs.1,00,000/otherwise you would be killed by setting fire". Deceased informed on phone that she is being ill treated and beaten. Thereafter, he says that his daughter had called upon him on phone, but since he had kept his mobile for charging at the neighbours place, he could not talk. Then around 9.00 to 10.00 hours at night, one Israrkhan Pathan from Parbhani gave phone call to him and informed that his daughter has been killed by appellant by pouring kerosene and setting fire. Interesting point to be noted is that most of his examination-in-chief has been taken in question and answer form by the learned Presiding Officer. No doubt, it is the prerogative of the concerned Judge as to how he should record deposition of a person, however, only in respect of clarifications etc. such question and answer form can be adopted. It cannot be for many questions. Rather it shows that the witness is not willing to tell all the facts to the Court, but then it has been so extracted. Testimony of such person rather loses credibility. A very lengthy cross-examination has been taken on behalf of the defence and it can be found that most part of it, is irrelevant. Going into the minute details may not be acceptable. What remains in this case is the father is not sure as to when exactly the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- was demanded. Initially, when alleged demand was made, there was no specification and when specific amount was demanded, it was only
