The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous. The petitioner sought discharge due to inability to contact him, but the court noted the impugned order was complied with and the petitioner delayed proceedings by not cooperating with counsel for six years.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(7)-WP-13839-16.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJI GOVINDRAO GOVINDRAO PANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2022.08.26 10:07:08 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.13839 OF 2016
Shri. Puna Bairagichandra Parida Kapoor ..Petitioner Versus
Mr. Haresh Kanji Patel & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Siddharth Chandrashekhar i/by Bruno Castellino, for the Petitioner.
Mr. J. H. Ramgude i/by P. g. Chandeliya, for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
Mr. C. D. Mali, AGP for the Respondent No.4.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2022
P.C.
BGP. 1 o f 2
(7)-WP-13839-16.doc .
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
2 o f 2
BGP.
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous due to the petitioner's lack of cooperation and compliance with the impugned order.
Whether the petitioner can claim discharge on the ground of being unable to contact him.
Whether the impugned order under Section 23(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act has been complied with.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri. Puna Bairagichandra Parida Kapoor
Mr. Haresh Kanji Patel & Ors.
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
