Allowed

Mr.Khaliluddin Asrafuddin Khatib v. Mr. Ishaque Ismail Shaikh

Bombay HC24 Aug 2022IA/3809/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an interim application regarding unpaid license fees, the High Court deferred dismissal of the writ petition on the condition that the petitioner must deposit the arrears within eight weeks; failure to do so would result in dismissal without further reference.

What did the court decide?

Directions to deposit entire arrested license fees amount within eight weeks; writ petition shall stand dismissed if amount is not so deposited.

Mr.Khaliluddin Asrafuddin Khatib Vs Mr. Ishaque Ismail… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1/2

¶2

2.IA.3809.2020.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3809 OF 2020 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.12438 OF 2019

¶6

Khaliluddin Ashrafuddin Khatib ... Applicant In the matter between:Ishaque Ismail Shaikh ... Petitioner V/s. Khaliluddin Ashrafuddin Khatib ... Respondent

¶7

Mr. Mandar Soman a/w. Mr. Hardik Joshi for the Applicant Mr. A. A. Mirza i/b. Adv. Uzair Kazi for the Respondent

¶8

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

¶9

DATED : 24^th AUGUST, 2022

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

Heard.

¶12

The competent authority directed the petitioner to pay the license fees @ Rs.24,000/- per month from 24/01/2019 till handing over of the possession.

¶13

In the above interim application prayer is made for issuance of directions to the petitioner/licensee to deposit the amount as was directed in this Court.

¶14

The contentions of the counsel for the petitioner while resisting the said prayer is, leave and license agreement which is formed to be the basis for issuance of such directions is unregistered apart from the fact that it is forged and fabricated. According to him, the petitioner is

1/2

akn

2/2

2.IA.3809.2020.doc

claiming ownership over the property.

¶20

I have appreciated the aforesaid submissions.

¶21

This Court requires to be sensitive to the fact that the petitioner has suffered order of eviction based on the leave and license agreement and is enjoying protection from this Court.

¶22

The fact that the petitioner has not paid license fees from 24/01/2019 is not disputed. Apart from above, the claim of the petitioner that he is the owner of the property is informed to be subjudiced before the City Civil Court, Mumbai.

¶23

In the aforesaid background, the petitioner cannot be permitted to continue to enjoy the suit premises without there being any reasonable conditions.

¶24

That being so, as directed by the competent authority, if the petitioner fails to deposit the entire amount of arrears of license fees as directed in the impugned order dated 29/08/2019, the writ petition shall stands dismissed without further reference to the Court.

¶25

The said amount be deposited within a period of eight weeks from today, as is consented.

¶26

The application stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶27

ANANTKRISHNANAIK Digitally signed byANANT KRISHNA NAIKDate: 2022.08.2416:40:06 +0530

¶28

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶29

2/2

¶30

akn

Mr.Khaliluddin Asrafuddin Khatib v. Mr. Ishaque Ismail Shaikh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Khaliluddin Asrafuddin Khatib v. Mr. Ishaque Ismail Shaikh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Vitthal Jadhav Decd Thru Lhrs Vs Shri. Shivkumar Janardan Kanthale (Since Deceased through Lrs.) 1A. Smt. Jaya Kiran Aarve and Ors.

M/S. Gami Developers, Prop. Shri. Murji Banji Gami Vs Smt. Sunanda Bhimraj Patil

Mrs. Ahmadi Wd/O. Farid Ahmed and Others Vs Mr. Baitulla Mohammed Mustafa

Nelson Domnic Dsouza Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Raj Castle Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sou. Nanda Sarjerao Bhandawalkar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Rural Development and Gramvikas Ministry and Ors.