The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition citing violation of a magistrate's order by the respondent. The High Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 1 12-WP-1336-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1336 OF 2022
Amit s/o Vinodkumar Sahu & Anr.
vs. Deputy Regional Transport Officer, Wardha & Anr.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. A.R. Ingole, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A.A. Madiwale, A.G.P. for the Respondents/ State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ. DATED : 15 MARCH 2022
The learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that since the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karanja is being violated, the Petitioners will approach the concerned Court with the grievance, and seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
[ ANIL L. PANSARE, J. ] [ NITIN JAMDAR, J. ]
Digitally signed bySUMIT CHETAN AGRAWAL Signing Date:16.03.2022 17:26
SUMIT
Amit s/o Vinodkumar Sahu & Anr.
Deputy Regional Transport Officer, Wardha & Anr.
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
