The Writ Petition challenging a Debt Recovery Tribunal order was dismissed due to the availability of an alternative remedy before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. Contentions were kept open.
Writ Petition disposed of
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 1437.22.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 1437/2022
Prakash Balkrushna Parekh and another
Petitioners.
Versus
Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd and another
Respondents.
Shri R.A. Bagde, Advocate for the Petitioners.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATED : 14 MARCH 2022
P.C.:
Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners.
[ANIL L. PANSARE, J]
[NITIN JAMDAR, J]
SANDEEPCHANDRASHEKHARDESHMUKH Digitally signed by SANDEEPCHANDRASHEKHARDESHMUKHDate: 2022.03.16 16:47:31+0530
Deshmukh
Prakash Balkrushna Parekh
another
Equitas Small Finance Bank Ltd
another
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
