The petitioner, an assistant teacher wrongly retired, moved for reinstatement. The court found the petitioner no longer interested in prosecuting the petition after the extended period expired and disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Rules is discharged. Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp 129.2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.129/2010
Syed Mubain Ahmad Syed Munaf ... Petitioner
Zilla Parishad, Amravati and others ... Respondents
None for the parties.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATE : 20 APRIL 2022
P.C. :
The Petitioner was working as an Assistant Teacher in a school run by Respondent No.1-Zilla Parishad, Amravati. He was appointed on 12 February 1970 and was confirmed on 25 September 1970. The Petitioner filed this Writ Petition on 4 January 2010 contending that he has been wrongly retired on 31 March 2008 when his term should be 31 March 2010. The Petitioner had sought a relief that he should be continued in
2 wp 129.2010
service till 31 March 2010 after granting reinstatement. In this Petition, Rule was issued on 16 February 2010. No interim relief was granted. Thereafter, when the Petition came up on Board earlier, none appeared for the Petitioner.
4. Rules is discharged.
(ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Deshmukh
Syed Mubain Ahmad Syed Munaf
Zilla Parishad, Amravati
Nitin Jamdar
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
