Santosh Ramchandra Tatikondawar Vs the Secretary, Public Works Department, Mumbai and Others

The Petitioner claims to have moved this petition in a public interest and has sought to point out the condition of the road. According to the Petitioner, the Contractors are not performing their task entrusted to them. According to the Petitioner, Respondent No.5 - the Executive Engineer and

¶14

SUMIT

¶15

2 / 2 9-PIL-17-2022

¶16

Respondent No.7 – Assistant Engineer are the ground level officers, who are directly concerned with the particular stretch of the road and they have neglected to take action.

¶17

According to us, the appropriate course of action would be to place this petition before the Chief Engineer of National Highways, who is the superior of Respondent Nos. 5 and 7 and who is entrusted in the task of overseeing the construction of highways in the State of Maharashtra, so that he can look into the matter and take necessary action, if it is so warranted.

¶18

Learned In-charge Government Pleader states that copy of the petition would be forwarded to the Chief Engineer for the said purpose.

¶19

With these observations, the Public Interest Litigation is disposed of.

¶20

[ ANIL L. PANSARE, J. ] [ NITIN JAMDAR, J. ]

¶21

Digitally signed bySUMIT CHETAN AGRAWAL Signing Date:21.04.2022 17:22

¶22

SUMIT

Santosh Ramchandra Tatikondawar v. the Secretary, Public Works Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Ramchandra Tatikondawar v. the Secretary, Public Works Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaikh Abdul Majeed Abdul Mahemud Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Balvant Asaram Chavan and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bhagvanji Raiyani vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Bhagvanji Rayani vs State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Shaikh Anwar Jainuddin Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Hrishikesh Laxman Kolhe Vs the State of Maharshtra and Ors.

Virbhadra Basling Swami Vs Chief Secretory, the State of Maharashtra, Mumbai and Others

Adv. Firoz Babulal Sayyed Vs the Union of India and Anr.

M/S. Deshmukh and Deshmukh (Jv) Thr. Partners, Rajesh Dadarao Deshmukh, Akola Vs Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Dept. Circle, Akola and Others

Pushpabai Marotrao Jadhav and Others Vs the Competent Authority @ Sub Divisional Officer @ Land Acquisition Officer, Umarkhed, Yavatmal

Yogesh R. Katre and Others Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Others

Sayed Mubin Ahmed Syed Munaf Vs Zp, Amravati Thr. Its CEO and 2 Ors.

Sunil S/O Gayaprasad Mishra Vs the Chancellor Rashatrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University

Sau. Vidyadevi Hemantkumar Vyas Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Others