Petition against an interim order declared infructuous as the final order has been passed. The petition and associated interim application are disposed without any substantive relief or reasoning provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
8.WP.1156.2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1156 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 21449 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1156 OF 2020
S. T. Kamgar Ghar Bandhani Sahakari Sanstha, Sangli
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra & Ors
...Respondents
Mr. Vilas B Tapkir for the petitioner Mrs. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for the respondent-State. Adv. Kuldeep U. Nikam for the Respondent No. 7 & 8
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATED : 26th AUGUST, 2022
P.C.:
Digitally signed ANANTKRISHNA by ANANTKRISHNA NAIKDate: NAIK 2022.08.2614:39:38 +0530
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
1/1
akn
S. T. Kamgar Ghar Bandhani Sahakari Sanstha, Sangli
The State Of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
