This writ petition challenging an interim order was disposed of as infructuous because the underlying original application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal had already been finally disposed of.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-aswp11306-2022
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.11306 OF 2022
Chandrakant Mahadev Kadam …Petitioner V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
Ms. Bhagyashri M. Ranade i/by Mr. Suhas Deokar for the petitioner.
Ms. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the State.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. & MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 2022
P.C.:
1. Since Original Application No. 4 of 2022 before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai has been disposed of finally by an order dated 16th June 2022, this writ petition wherein an interim order dated 10th April 2022 is under challenge does not survive. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
Digitally signed by ATUL ATUL GANESH GANESH KULKARNI KULKARNI Date: 2022.09.22 14:45:20 +0530
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Chandrakant Mahadev Kadam
State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court