Disposed

Sunita Arun Agarwal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC3 Aug 2022WP/551/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of three criminal writ petitions and one interim application. The disposal followed the filing of a closure report by the State authorities, which rendered the writ petitions no longer necessary to keep pending.

What did the court decide?

All Writ Petitions No. 601 of 2016, 428 of 2020, 551 of 2020 and Interim Application No. 1686 of 2021 are disposed of.

Sunita Arun Agarwal Vs the State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

901-WP-601-2016.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 601 OF 2016

¶3

Neha Manan Agarwal @ Neha Arunkumar Agrawal … Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents

¶6

AND

¶7

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 428 OF 2020

¶8

Arun Kumar Ramswarup Agarwal … Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Maharashtra and others … Respondents

¶11

AND

¶12

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 551 OF 2020

¶13

WITH

¶14

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1686 OF 2021

Sunita Arun Agarwal

… Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another … Respondents

¶19

Mr. Sanjeev Kadam alongwith Mr. Rupesh Gite, Ms. Rama Somani instructed by Mr. Chetan Alai for the Petitioner in WP-601-2016. Ms. Alka Pandey instructed by Law Global for the Petitioner in WP428-2020 and WP-551-2020. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the State.

Kanchan P Dhuri

1 / 3

901-WP-601-2016.odt

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATED : 3 AUGUST 2022

¶24

P.C. :-

¶25

On 20 December 2021, following order was passed :

¶26

“Request is made on behalf of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners in the Writ Petition No. 601 of 2016 for adjournment. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner in the Writ Petition No. 428 of 2020 states that as per his information the Police Authorities have filed a negative report stating that no offence is made out. The learned APP has no instructions in that regard. If that is the position, the Writ Petition No. 428 of 2020 may not survive.

¶27

To enable the learned APP to make a statement, stand over to 17 January 2022 under the caption “For Directions”.”

¶28

Yesterday, when the Petitions were called out the learned APP had sought time to confirm the position.

¶29

Today, the learned APP on instructions states that the closure report (C-Summary) is filed. In view of this position, it is not necessary to keep the Petitions pending, as depending on the further steps taken pursuant to the closure report, parties will have their

Kanchan P Dhuri

2 / 3

901-WP-601-2016.odt

remedies open. Accordingly, all the above Writ Petitions are disposed of. The Interim Application also stands disposed of.

¶34

( N.R. BORKAR, J. )

¶35

( NITIN JAMDAR, J. )

¶36

Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN PRASHANT PRASHANT DHURI DHURI Date: 2022.08.04 17:29:11 +0530

¶37

Kanchan P Dhuri

¶38

3 / 3

Sunita Arun Agarwal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Arun Agarwal v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Suresh Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra

Chhaya S. Panse and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Pravin Dattatraya Shirore and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Arun Kumar Ramswarup Agarwal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Neha Manan Agarwal @ Neha Arunkumar Agrawal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Gopinath Kurup Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.