Single judge of the Goa Bench disposed of Second Appeal and Civil Application based on admitted consent terms. A decree was directed accordingly.
Second Appeal and Civil Application disposed; decree to be drawn per consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
06-SA-55-2018.DOC
Andreza
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2018
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2018
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2018
Sharad Yeshwant Mayekar & anr. … Appellants
Versus
Naguesh Yeshwant Mayekar & anr. …Respondents
Mr. Bhupesh Prabhu Dessai, Advocate for the Appellants. Mr. Amey Kakodkar, Advocate for the Respondent no.1. Mr. P. Karpe, Advocate for the Respondent no.3.
CORAM: SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J DATED: 12th July 2022
P.C.
1. Parties to the Second Appeal are present in the Court. Except
Mr. Naguesh Mayekar, Respondent no.2, others, are identified by their Advocates. All admit the contents and execution of memo of consent terms. Memo is taken on record and marked X-1 for identification.
Page 1 of 2 12th July 2022
06-SA-55-2018.DOC
2. In consideration of the Consent Terms, the Second Appeal is disposed of. Decree be drawn in accordance with the Consent Terms.
3. Second Appeal along with Civil Application, stands disposed of.
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J
Page 2 of 2 12th July 2022
Sharad Yeshwant Mayekar & anr.
Naguesh Yeshwant Mayekar & anr.
SANDEEP K. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
