The High Court of Bombay at Goa held that the cause of action for the writ petition had ceased to exist, rendering it infructuous. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without granting any substantive relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24 WP 120 OF 2022.ODT
Esha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 120 OF 2022
SAVIO REBELLO AND 2 ORS. … PETITIONERS
VS
OSCAR REBELLO AND 5 ORS. … RESPONDENTS
Mr. Nigel Costa Frias with Ms. Laxmi Sawant, Advocates for the Petitioners.
Mr. Amey Kakodkar with Mr. Pankaj Shirodkar, Advocates for the Respondents.
CORAM: SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.
DATED: 5 JULY 2022
P.C:
1. Affidavit sworn by Petitioner No. 1 with photographs is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
2. Objection of the Respondents to statement in paragraph 2 of the affidavit is noted.
3. In view of the statements in Affidavit, the cause of action, ceased to exist. Thus, Petition has become infructuous. It is disposed of accordingly.
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.
Page 1 of 1 5 July 2022
VAIGANKAR Digitally signed by VAIGANKAR ESHA SAINATH ESHA SAINATH Date: 2022.07.06 10:33:43 +05'30'
SAVIO REBELLO AND 2 ORS.
OSCAR REBELLO AND 5 ORS.
SANDEEP K. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
