The High Court allowed the second appeal to be withdrawn on the day of hearing. Consequently, the civil application was also disposed of as withdrawn.
The second appeal allowed to be withdrawn; Civil Application No. 329 of 2015 disposed off as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-CAS-329-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.329 OF 2015
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.519 OF 1996
BALIRAM M. MHATRE AND OTHERS
)...APPLICANTS
V/s.
VASUDEO V. DHARAP (since deceased)
through heirs) AND OTHERS)...RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.M.Railkar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Rohit Joshi i/by. Gauri Godse, Advocate for Respondent
Nos.1A to 1C and 2 to 6.
Mr. P.D.Dalvi, Advocate for Respondent Nos.7 to 10.
CORAM: V. G. BISHT, J.
DATE: 23rd FEBRUARY 2022
P.C.:
1Heard learned counsel for the appellant. The learned
counsel has produced on record letter dated 15th January 2022
whereby appellant has instructed to withdraw the appeal. The
said letter is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
AVK 1/2
Digitally signed byARTI ARTI VILAS VILAS KHATATE KHATATE Date: 2022.02.23 16:49:50 +0530
2-CAS-329-2015.doc
2 In view of this, the second appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and stands disposed off as withdrawn.3 In view of above, Civil Application No.329 of 2015 also stands disposed off. (V. G. BISHT, J.)
AVK 2/2
BALIRAM M. MHATRE AND OTHERS
VASUDEO V. DHARAP AND OTHERS
V. G. BISHT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court