Dismissed
Laxmi Yera Mane v. Mr. Vinod Yera Mane and Another
Bombay HCIA/237/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-AO-51-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 51 OF 2022
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 237 OF 2022
Laxmi Yera Mane… Appellant
Versus
Vinod Yera Mane and Anr.
… Respondents
Mr. Akshay Kapadia, for the Appellant.
Mr. Anil R. Mishra, for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. Om Suryawanshi, for Respondent No.2-MCGM.
CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J.
DATE : 22nd FEBRUARY, 2022
PC:
Learned Counsel for appellant makes a statement that he would
be filing reply along with relevant compilation of documents in the trial
Court and requests that the trial Court be directed to expedite the
hearing of Notice of Motion. Learned Counsel for respondents object to
the submission of learned Counsel for the appellant.
Rekha Patil 1/2
Digitally signed by REKHA REKHA PRAKASH PRAKASH PATIL PATIL Date: 2022.02.22 16:35:35 +0530
27-AO-51-2022.odt
2 In view of above, learned trial Court is requested to dispose of theNotice of Motion within eight weeks from the receipt of this Order.3 Appeal from Order stands disposed of accordingly.4 In view of disposal of Appeal from Order, Interim Application No. 237 of 2022 stands disposed of accordingly. (V. G. BISHT, J.)
Rekha Patil 2/2
Laxmi Yera Mane
Vinod Yera Mane
Vinod Yera Mane and Anr.
V. G. BISHT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court