The High Court allowed the second appeal to be withdrawn simplicitor, granting leave for withdrawal and disposing of the appeal, interim applications, and cross objection accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal, interim applications, and cross objection disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01-SA-467-1993.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 467 OF 1993
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4532 OF 1993
WITH
CROSS OBJECTION (STAMP) NO. 3959 OF 1994
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 467 OF 1993
Rukminibai Dattatraya Lad and Anr.
… Appellants
Versus
Sou. Saraswati Dinkar Padekar and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Kush Lahankar i/b Mr. Rahul P. Walvekar, for the Appellants.
Mr. Ketan Dhavale i/b Mr. Mandar Limaye, for Respondent Nos. 1-A
and1-B.
CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J.
DATE : 25th FEBRUARY, 2022.
PC:
The learned counsel for the Appellants seeks leave simplicitor to
withdraw the Appeal. The Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn
simplicitor and stands disposed of as withdrawn.
2 In view of disposal of Appeal, Interim Applications stand disposedof accordingly.
(V. G. BISHT, J.)
REKHA PRAKASH PATIL
Rekha Patil 1/1
Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2022.02.25 14:43:15 +0530
Rukminibai Dattatraya Lad
Sou. Saraswati Dinkar Padekar
V. G. Bisht
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court