Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay allowed a Second Appeal to be withdrawn simplicitor and disposed of the appeal and associated interim applications as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Appeal allowed to be withdrawn simplicitor; appeal and interim applications disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01-SA-467-1993.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 467 OF 1993
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4532 OF 1993
WITH
CROSS OBJECTION (STAMP) NO. 3959 OF 1994
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 467 OF 1993
Rukminibai Dattatraya Lad and Anr.
… Appellants
Versus
Sou. Saraswati Dinkar Padekar and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Kush Lahankar i/b Mr. Rahul P. Walvekar, for the Appellants.
Mr. Ketan Dhavale i/b Mr. Mandar Limaye, for Respondent Nos. 1-A
and1-B.
CORAM : V. G. BISHT, J.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rukminibai Dattatraya Lad
- appellant
Rukminibai Dattatraya Lad and Anr.
- respondent
Sou. Saraswati Dinkar Padekar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court