Ajay Pandurang Phale v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application kept for dismissal due to non-appearance of applicant on two dates; dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2.REVN.88.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.88 OF 2019
Ajay Pandurang PhaleApplicant
versus
The State of Mharashtra and othersRespondents
None present for applicant.
Mr.A.R.Patil, APP, for State.
CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE :13th June 2022
PC :
None present for the applicant. On the previous date of
hearing i.e. 18th April 2022 also none was present for applicant. The
application was kept for dismissal today. Hence the application is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
MST
Ajay Pandurang Phale
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court