Application for withdrawal of a criminal revision application permitted because the underlying matter involving an FIR had been quashed by consent by another court.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; it stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rpa 1/1 4revn168of2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.168 OF 2020
Pramod G. Nair .. Applicant Versus
State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents
Ms.Sakshi Jha i/b. Mr.Nitin Sejpal, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr.Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State.
Ms.Kokila Kalra i/b. Ms.Breeta, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Mr.Nandkishoer R. Bodare, PSI, Kandivali Police Station, Mumbai, present.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK J.
DATED : JUNE 10, 2022.
P.C. :
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI RAJESHRI PRAKASH PRAKASH AHER AHER Date: 2022.06.13 17:26:01 +0530
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this application since the first information report, which is subject matter of the present proceedings has been quashed by consent vide order dated 28th February, 2022 (Coram : Prasanna B. Varale and Surendra P. Tavade, JJ.).
2 In view of submissions, the Revision Application is
allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Pramod G. Nair
State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
