The Court allowed the applicant's revision application to be withdrawn. The criminal proceedings were expedited, with a direct instruction to the trial Court to conclude the trial within nine months from the date of the order.
Application allowed to be withdrawn; trial expedited to conclude within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-REVN-139-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 139 OF 2020
Dinesh S. Patil ...Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Adv. Rahul Kadam a/w Adv. Rashi Sheth, for the Applicant.
Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE: 9th JUNE, 2022.
PER COURT:
Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions submits that the application may be allowed to be withdrawn. It is however submitted that the applicant has been facing this prosecution for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. At the relevant time he was Assistant Public Prosecutor at Palghar, hence, trial may be expedited.In view of submission, the application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.The trial is expedited.The trial Court shall make an endeavour to conclude the trial within a period of nine months from today.Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALILIYAKAT LIYAKATJAMADARDate: Sajakali Jamadar JAMADAR 2022.06.10 18:57:06 +0530
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision application seeking withdrawal and expedition of trial ought to be allowed.
Dinesh S. Patil
The State Of Maharashtra
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court