The petitioner's Criminal Writ Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent from multiple hearings and no advocate appeared.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.WP.544.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.544 OF 2019
Ganesh Padmanabh GulgulePetitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and another
Respondents
None present for petitioner.
Mr.Arfan Sait, APP, for State.
CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE :8th June 2022
PC :
None for petitioner. Perusal of previous orders would indicate
that petitioner’s advocate was not present on 22nd February 2022,
23rd February 2022 and 13th April 2022. Hence, petition is dismissed
for want of prosecution.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
MST
MANISH Digitally signed byMANISH SURESH SURESH THATTE THATTE Date: 2022.06.0915:41:36 +0530
Ganesh Padmanabh Gulgule
The State of Maharashtra and another
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court