PIL regarding completion of public work was disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioner. Court granted leave to withdraw security deposit.
PIL disposed of as withdrawn. Security deposit of Rs.50,000/- to be refunded within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
999pil34-21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
999 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.34 OF 2021
OMPRAKASH DIGAMBARAPPA PATRE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh S. Taur
AGP for Respondents 1, 2, 6 7: Mr. A. R. Kale
Advocate for respondent No.3: Mr. D. Y. Nandedkar
Advocate for respondent No.8: Mr. S.V. Natu
CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA & S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 1st April, 2022
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner tenders a copy of the letter dated 29th March,2022 issued by the Chief Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Ardhapur to the petitioner stating that the work in question is completed. The learned counsel also tenders a copy of the letter dated 31st March, 2022 addressed to him by the petitioner thereby requesting the learned counsel to withdraw P.I.L. No.34/2021 on the ground that the purpose of filing this PIL has been achieved and the grievance of the petitioner has been met with.Copy of the letters dated 29th March, 2022 and 31st March, 2022 are taken on record.P.I.L. No. 34/2021 is disposed of as withdrawn.Page 1 of 2
999pil34-21
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw an amount of Rs.50,000/- deposited with this Court pursuant to the order dated 18th June, 2021. The office is directed to refund the said amount of Rs.50,000/- to the petitioner within a period of twoweeks from the communication of this Court.
( S. G. MEHARE, J. )
( R.D. DHANUKA, J. )
JPC
Page 2 of 2
OMPRakash DIGAMBARAPPA PATRE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R.D. DHANUKA
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court