Disposed

Dr Bhaskar Kashinathrao Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC1 Apr 2022CA/706/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed an application to amend writ petition prayer clauses before admission. The court set a timeline for amendment and stipulated a specific date for admitting the petition.

What did the court decide?

Civil application allowed in terms of amendment of prayer clauses; petition to be placed on admission board on 6th June, 2022.

Dr Bhaskar Kashinathrao Shinde Vs the State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

946ca706-20

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

946 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.706 OF 2020
IN WP/9459/2018 WITH WP/9459/2018

¶4

DR BHASKAR KASHINATHRAO SHINDE
VERSUS

¶5

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶6

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kshitij H. Surve
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. S. K. Tambe
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Sujit A. Hake h/for
Mr. D. J. Chaudhari

¶7

CORAM: R.D. DHANUKA & S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 1st April, 2022

¶8

ORDER :

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant states that all the

¶10

respondents are served. The statement is accepted.

¶11

Affidavit in reply is filed by the State.

¶12

By this civil application, the applicant seeks to amend the writ petition as set out in prayer Clauses (B) and (C).

¶13

Writ petition is not yet admitted. In view of this we are inclined to allow this application in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C).

¶14

Amendment be carried out within two week from today. Amendment shall also be carried out in the copies supplied to the respondents.

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

Merely because the amendment is permitted would not mean that contentions raised therein and the prayers sought are deemed to have been admitted by the respondents. The respondents are at liberty to file affidavit in reply within a period of one week from the date the applicant carry out amendment in the copies. Rejoinder, if any shall be filed within one week thereafter.

¶17

Place the petition on admission board on 6^th June, 2022.

¶18

Civil application stands disposed of of in aforesaid terms.

¶19

( S. G. MEHARE, J. )

¶20

 ( R.D. DHANUKA, J. )

¶21

JPC

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Dr Bhaskar Kashinathrao Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Bhaskar Kashinathrao Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Dhruv Bildcon a Partnership Firm Reg. as Per Partnership Act Thr Its Partners and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Laxmibai Nivarti Bhande and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Virendrasingh Indrasingh Girase Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Jyoti Nagnathrao Sunknikar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ashabai Dinkar Ghansawant Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Tadvi Ayesha Khanam Sajid Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another