Petitioner sought an order to set aside cancellation of individual approval for a post. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, who expressed hope of applying if the post is advertised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP No. 6759/22
SSC
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6759 OF 2022
Shri Jaysing S/o Sonya Padavi
....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
....Respondents
Mr. S.U. Chaudhari, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for respondent/State.
CORAM : DIPANKAR DATTA, C.J. & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
DATED : JULY 04, 2022.
PER COURT :
We have considered the submissions of the learned advocate for the petitioner in the light of the prayer clauses. We have expressed our disinclination in view of the order dated 29.12.2015 issued by the Director of Education (Primary), Maharashtra State, Pune, thereby cancelling the individual approval granted to the petitioner.
instructions, that as there is a vacancy, he hopes that the institution would follow the due procedure and if such post is advertised, he would apply as against such advertisement.
2
WP No. 6759/22
Shri Jaysing S/o Sonya Padavi
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
