This court dismissed the underlying writ petition following the husband's non-appearance. A Notice of Motion was allowed and disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by HEMANT CHANDERSEN HEMANT SHIV CHANDERSEN Date: SHIV 2022.07.12 13:55:56 +0530
52.nmw26.19.doc
Shiv
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.26 OF 2019
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2534 OF 2017
Ansari Ahmed Mohammed Yusuf… Applicant/Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. M.G. Ansari i/b A. A. Maniyar for the Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. Kedar Dighe AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Sagar Patil for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 – MCGM.
Mr. Asim M. Khan for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. M. MODAK, JJ.
DATED : 7TH JULY 2022
P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. The Writ Petition is dismissed under the order of this Court dated 18th December 2018, as none appeared for the Petitioner.
3. For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion, Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
4. Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly.
(S. M. MODAK, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
1/1
Ansari Ahmed Mohammed Yusuf
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
S. M. MODAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court