Allowed

Smt. Twinkle Dhananjay Dhavale v. Dhananjay Ganesh Dhavale

Bombay HC4 Jan 2022MCA/32/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay allowed the applicant-wife's incidental application for transfer of a pending matrimonial petition from the Family Court at Pune to the Family Court at Nashik considering the grounds of hardship raised. The respondent did not appear.

What did the court decide?

Order directing the marriage petition No. A/798/2020 pending before the Family Court, Pune to be transferred to the Family Court at Nashik.

Smt. Twinkle Dhananjay Dhavale Vs Dhananjay Ganesh… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

MCA-32-2021.doc

BDP-SPS-TAC

BHARAT

DASHARATH PANDIT

Digitally signedby BHARATDASHARATHPANDIT Date: 2022.01.0418:53:48 +0530

¶6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2021

¶8

SMT. TWINKLE DHANANJAY DHAVALE ….Applicant
V/s

¶9

DHANANJAY GANESH DHAVALE. ...Respondent

¶10

Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle for the Applicant.

¶11

CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

¶12

 DATE: JANUARY 04, 2022

¶13

P.C.:-

¶14

1] Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant.

¶15

2] Though served, none appears for the Respondent.

¶16

3] Considering the grounds raised in support of hardship, prayer of the Applicant-wife for transfer needs to be allowed.

¶17

4] As such, Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Prayer clause (a) reads as under:-

¶18

(a) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to pass

¶19

appropriate order and direction directing the marriage petition No.A/798/2020 pending before Hon’ble Family Court, Pune may transfer to Hon’ble Family Court at Nashik on such terms as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.”

¶20

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )

¶21

1/1

Smt. Twinkle Dhananjay Dhavale v. Dhananjay Ganesh Dhavale

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Twinkle Dhananjay Dhavale v. Dhananjay Ganesh Dhavale

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sau. Ashwini Vishal Shirolkar Vs Shri. Vishal Vilas Shirolakar

Pratima Chandrashekhar Bartakke Vs Chandrashekhar Sarjerao Bartakke

Sharad Sahakari Bank Limited, Manchar, Thr. Chief Executive Officer Vs Sunni Jumma Masjid Education Trust, Thr. President Nasir S/O Mohemood Miya Shaikh and Ors.

Simplex Infrastructure Limited vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.

Mr. Ashok Vithoba Ghone Vs Mr. Ramchandra Shankar Khomane through His Lrs. and Ors.

Sou. Shraddha Mahesh Jangam Vs Shri. Mahesh Chandrakant Jangam