In a vacation court interim application linked to a withdrawn bail application, the apex High Court of Bombay disposed of both filings as the underlying bail petition was withdrawn by counsel for the applicant without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.Cri.IA.1317.22.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1317 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1143 OF 2022
Rohit Krishnakumar Sonar..Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra..Respondent
Mr. Pratik Gupta a/w. Mr. Govind Ghogare for the Applicant.Mr. S.R.Agarkar, APP for the State – Respondent. ...................CORAM:MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:JUNE 03, 2022.
(Vacation Court)
P. C. :
1. Mr. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks to withdraw the present Bail Application. The Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
2. In view of the disposal of the Bail Application, Interim Application No. 1317 of 2022 also stands disposed of.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
SONALI Digitally signedby SONALI SATISH SATISH KILAJEDate: 2022.06.03 KILAJE 16:52:11 +0530
1 of 1
Rohit Krishnakumar Sonar
The State of Maharashtra
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court