This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2. BA.696.22.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 696 OF 2022
Raju Subhash Walkar @ Patil..Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra..Respondent
Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for the Applicant.Mr. A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent-State.CORAM :MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:JUNE 01, 2022.
(Vacation Court)
P.C.:
1. Instructions received from the Applicant have been taken on
record and marked “X” for identification. The present application hasbecome infructuous.
2. In view thereof, Application stands disposed of as infructous.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed by AJAY AJAYTRAMBAK TRAMBAKUGALMUGALE UGALMUGALE Date: 2022.06.01 19:11:32 +0530
1 of 1
Raju Subhash Walkar @ Patil
State of Maharashtra
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court