An order correcting clerical errors in a previous judgment regarding compensation amounts and party names in an appeal involving an insurance company.
Correction of compensation amount to Rs. 2,75,000/- and correction of party reference from 'appellant' to 'respondent No.1'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
S-FA-442-2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 442 OF 2006
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD VERSUS NILESH VIJAYKUMAR GODHA AND OTHERS
... Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. V.I. Thole
CORAM : S.G. DIGE, J. DATE : 6th October, 2022
ORDER :
Nos.3 and 4 to pay compensation amount of Rs.2,75,0000/-, it should be amount of Rs.2,75,000/-.
Pooja K.
{2} S-FA-442-2006
permitted “appellant” to withdraw the amount in clause (iii) of the operative order, it should be “respondent No.1”. Hence, requested to pass appropriate orders.
Pooja K.
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD
NILESH VIJAYKUMAR GODHA
S.G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
